Call for Applications
GAATW International Secretariat and Kolkata-Sanved are co-organising a workshop on Dance Movement Therapy for women colleagues providing psycho-social assistance to trafficked and/or abused women migrant workers in Asia:
Dance Movement Therapy Workshop for Care Givers
What is Dance Movement Therapy (DMT) & What it is Not?
Dance/Movement Therapy (DMT) is defined by the American Dance Therapy Association (ADTA) as "The psychotherapeutic use of movement as a process which furthers the emotional, cognitive and physical integration of the individual."
DMT offers the individual the opportunities to be expressive, release tension or trauma, find their inner voice, and their independence. It can be practiced both as an individual and within group therapy in; health, education, social service settings and in private practice. It is founded on the principle that movement reflects an individual’s patterns of thinking and feeling. DMT can help participants shift to a more positive self image, less satisfying behaviors can be transformed to healthier expressions, and social struggles can be worked through alternative movement outlets. Psycho-physical techniques can provide new hope and possibilities for people who suffer from the pain and hardship of life’s psychological and social problems.
The foundations of DMT are formed from three influences; modern dance movement, movement analysis and the developing theories of psychotherapy. Marian Chace is the American pioneer of Dance Movement Therapy. Other pioneers include Blanche Evan, Mary Whitehouse, Trudy Schoop and Rudolf Laban.
Benefits of DMT
Dance/movement therapists work with individuals of all ages. They work directly with individuals and in group settings. We all have experienced the healing effects of movement, whether it be dancing the "electric slide" or taking an aerobics class. The dance/movement therapist intentionally taps into the healing nature of movement by using the art of dance as an observation/assessment tool and then as a means of choreographing responses to issues and movements members bring to a group. The dance/movement therapist responds, echoing and answering each person's movement, thus promoting feelings of self-worth. By utilizing the physical elements of breathing, posture, gesture, tension release, space, force/weight and time, people gain numerous benefits:
- Increase self-awareness, self-esteem and personal autonomy
- Experience links between thoughts, feelings and actions
- Increase and practice adaptive coping behaviors
- Express and manage overwhelming feelings or thoughts
- Maximize resources for communication
- Access internal resources through creative movement play
- Experience the impacts of personal actions on others
- Explore and experience internal and external reality
- Initiate physical, emotional and/or cognitive shifts and change
- Develop trusting relationships
- Manage feelings that interrupt learning
- Enhance skills in social interaction
Dance Movement Therapy does not aim to replace clinical methods to deal with trauma, nor are DMT sessions dance classes.
Who Can Participate in GAATW & Kolkata-Sanved Co-Organized Workshop?
Although DMT workshops can be used by many people in many diverse situations and indeed Kolkata-Sanved has worked with many different groups of people GAATW-IS has organized these workshops primarily for its member organisations in Asia. Recognizing the need for psycho-social care and the absence of affordable non-clinical methods to offer the services, we approached Kolkata-Sanved as a resource group. Introductions to Dance Movement Therapy & Art Therapy were given to colleagues at the Asia Regional Consultation in 2009. Later in the year, a DMT workshop was organized for Shakti-Samuha, a member of GAATW that is founded and run by survivors of trafficking. In 2010 another workshop was organized for members in Odisha, India. At the International Members Congress and Conference in 2010, Kolkata-Sanved and Gabfai-Thailand worked together to present an opening performance. And in 2011 GAATW-IS, upon request from members, organised a DMT workshop for social workers and care givers from Indonesia. The feed back from members who have participated in these workshops have been very positive. What has been emphasized again and again by colleagues is what minimal resources are needed for DMT (some space, some time and your willingness) and how they have been able to use it in various settings.
Encouraged by the positive feedback GAATW-IS and Kolkata-Sanved are planning to organize an 8 day DMT workshop for women colleagues working to provide psycho-social assistance to trafficked women and abused women migrant workers in Asia.
So if you are a woman and work in a shelter, a drop-in centre, a counselling centre or a short-stay home, for trafficked women or abused women migrant workers, this workshop is for you.
Although colleagues from GAATW Member organizations will get preference this workshop is not a members-only event. Maximum number of trainees is 25.
Date and Venue
The workshop is a residential one and will be for 8 days. It will be held in Thailand in mid-February, 2014. Exact date and venue will be announced by end of December, 2013.
- Expression of Interest & Preliminary Queries: Until 12 December, 2013
- Last Date to Receive Applications: 6 January, 2014
- Selection of Participants: By 20 January, 2014
- Logistics and Other Communication between Participants and Organisers: 25 January-10 Feb, 2014
- DMT Workshop: Mid-February
- Follow-Up Communication and Support Visit: March-August, 2014
For more details on the content and methodology of the workshop click here.
Click here for the Application Form.
A Few Words about GAATW and Kolkata-Sanved
The Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (GAATW) is an Alliance of more than 100 non-governmental organisations from Africa, Asia, Europe, LAC and North America. The GAATW International Secretariat is based in Bangkok, Thailand and co-ordinates the activities of the Alliance, collects and disseminates information, advocates on behalf of the Alliance at regional and international levels.
GAATW promotes rights of women migrant workers and trafficked persons and believes that ensuring safe migration and fair work places should be at the core of all anti-trafficking efforts. GAATW advocate for living and working conditions that provide women with more alternatives in their countries of origin, and to develop and disseminate information to women about migration, working conditions and their rights.
GAATW currently has 63 member organisations in Asia most of whom work directly with trafficked women and/or abused women migrant workers.
For more information visit www.gaatw.org, Contact:
Kolkata Sanved has pioneered the use of Dance Movement Therapy (DMT) as an effective, alternative approach to recovery and rehabilitation for survivors of human trafficking and violence; HIV/AIDS patients and people living with psychosocial disabilities. Breaking through barriers of traditional counseling and therapy, Kolkata Sanved uses movement and dance to enable individuals to reclaim their physical selves and their souls through a newfound sense of freedom, peace and confidence. The organization was awarded the prestigious Beyond Sport Award for Best Health Project in 2009, Dian Von Furstenberg Award for transforming other women’s lives in 2011 and Newsmaker 2012 for outstanding achievement and inspiration.
Kolkata Sanved believes that all individuals, from marginalized and mainstream populations, should live with dignity and self-respect. This basic sense of empowerment and integrity can be achieved through dance movement therapy (DMT).
The uniqueness of Kolkata Sanved’s programme lies in the fact that it harnesses the power of dance in two distinct yet interrelated ways: dance as an art form and dance as expressive movement therapy focused on self empowerment. DMT can be very alienated from the arts, and seen merely as a means of therapy only. But essentially as with any creative art form or practitioner, it is nurturing and developing the body, mind, thinking and creativity of the individual; that is what art does.
For more information visit http://www.kolkatasanved.org/
Filmed during the Transforming Steps project in Kolkata, India, this clip shows choreographer Mafalda Deville working with women from Kolkata Sanved (www.kolkatasanved.org). The piece they're developing will be performed at Sadler's Wells, London in March 2012 to raise awareness of the global problem of human trafficking.
“I saw that some survivors have tremendous artistic skills and they really want to be artists. I started training survivors to do dance therapy.” Sohini, Kolkata Sanved
“Why didn’t GAATW-IS organize this workshop for us before? This is extremely useful for us” - Participants at the Shakti Samuha Workshop
My week with everyone at Kampung Damai, the place where we all came together for DMT, was a magical time. Since then I have used DMT as self-care for many groups. Most recently with the LGBT groups in south east Asia. – Dewi Nova, Participant at the Indonesia Workshop
UN High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development
Roundtable 2: Measures to ensure respect for and protection of the human rights of all migrants, with particular reference to women and children, as well as to prevent and combat the smuggling of migrants and trafficking in persons and to ensure orderly, regular and safe migration.
3 October 2013
Your excellencies, distinguished chairpersons,
The Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women welcomes the opportunity of this roundtable and we thank you for giving us time to make this intervention.
We are an alliance of over 100 independent NGOs. We locate human trafficking in the context of migration and migrant worker rights, recognising that the majority of trafficked persons are migrant workers in informal, unorganised and unprotected labour sectors.
The story of humankind is a story of migrations. Our ability and drive to migrate and adapt are amongst the factors that made us human. Now more than ever, it is central to how we live: United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has called the 21st Century the “age of mobility”.
Human rights are central to safe migration. We call on States and this HLD to reaffirm the rights-based framework as the primary framework for intergovernmental discourse and action on migration, including by ensuring that all actors and forums in this area take human rights as the basis of their work.
And we urge States here to ensure that human rights remain at the heart of this roundtable. We are troubled that the HLD is framing what should be a panel on human rights in such a why as to focus instead on restrictions on and control of migration. For example, if we are discussing and identifying a list of rights-enhancing measures – why is combatting smuggling listed here?
By sheer necessity, many migrants pay a broker to reach their destination. There are circumstances where many migrants absolutely rely on smuggling to flee harmful situations such as armed conflicts. Driving smuggling further underground just increases the danger for migrants – including the risk of trafficking. Thus the framing of this roundtable regarding preventing and combatting smuggling is the wrong objective and will cause harm to migrants.
We remind States that the UN Smuggling Protocol creates the offence of smuggling but does not require States to criminalise people who are smuggled. Many State responses to smuggling go far beyond the intention of the protocol, including by criminalising people who are smuggled – and other irregular migrants.
Often the laws and policies against irregular migration, including those against people smuggling, are implemented in the name of addressing trafficking in persons. But the Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women is increasingly concerned with immigration measures that criminalise migrants and also badly affect people who have been trafficked. Many people in trafficking situations also classify, in government terms, as having been ‘smuggled’. Authorities do not always screen migrants to assess whether they might have been trafficked, but detain them as criminals, as ‘smuggled’ or as irregular migrants, deporting them before they have a chance to seek or receive the rights to which they are entitled. Conflating smuggling and trafficking leads to the over-policing of migrants and the under-policing and non-identification of people who have been trafficked. Furthermore, it prioritises a law enforcement rather than human rights approach. In doing so, the focus of the anti-trafficking efforts moves from the individual who has been trafficked and towards the security of the State. Similarly, there is a shifting of responsibility from the State to non-State actors.
The HLD and this roundtable offer an excellent opportunity to call on States to de-link smuggling and trafficking in order better to protect the rights of all migrants, and we urge States to ensure this clarity in the resolution from this session. We hope that an outcome of this roundtable will be a commitment to keep the focus on – as the first part of the title of the roundtable sets out – “Measures to ensure respect for and protection of the human rights of all migrants”.
 Protocol Against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, Supplementing the UN Convention Against Transnational Crime
GAATW at the People’s Global Action on Migration, Development & Human Rights (PGA) and the UN High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development (HLD) in New York
GAATW at the People’s Global Action on Migration, Development & Human Rights (PGA) and the UN High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development (HLD) in New York
GAATW-IS staff and some of our member organisations are in New York for the People’s Global Action on Migration, Development & Human Rights (30 September to 4 October) and the UN High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development (3 and 4 October) in New York. This is a great opportunity to not only meet and learn from migrant rights activists from all over the world but also to progress a rights-based approach to migration with States at the UN.
Bandana Pattanaik, GAATW IS’ International Coordinator, will be speaking at two side events to the HLD. The first is on migrant domestic workers and the second is on human rights at international borders. The programme for the HLD (plenary, roundtables, and side events) is available online.
At the PGA, we are grateful to be partnering with the Women and Global Migration Working Group (WGMWG), United Methodist Women, and the AFL-CIO to run three workshops. The first workshop is on smuggling and will be attended by the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants and the OHCHR. The second workshop concerns problems with the criminalization and law-enforcement approach to trafficking in persons and involves some of our US member organisations and friends. The third event is the launch of the second issue of the Anti-Trafficking Review! This event will be attended by contributing authors and will focus on human rights at borders. The full PGA programme is available here. If you’re in New York, we do hope you can join us!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE GAATW EVENTS AT THE PGA AND UNHLD FROM 1-4 OCTOBER 2013
Civil Society statement by APMM, APWLD, ARROW, CARAM-Asia, GAATW, MFA, MMN and Seven Sisters* on the Asia-Pacific Regional Preparatory Meeting for the General Assembly High-level Dialogue on International Migration and Development 2013
May 31, 2013
About 60 representatives from a diverse group of CSOs, NGOs and Trade Unions came together to prepare for this preparatory meeting in Bangkok, Thailand, in preparation for the General Assembly UN High-Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development scheduled to take place at the UN General Assembly in New York in October, 2013.
We were looking forward to 3 days of informed and informative discussion and debate with member States on the issues facing migrants in the Asia-Pacific region, that would eventually form our input for the upcoming High-Level Dialogue, we are not happy with the final outcome.
Though this Asia-Pacific Regional Preparatory Meeting for the General Assembly High-level Dialogue on International Migration and Development 2013 was able to obtain a negotiated outcome, we are disappointed that the text adopted by consensus by member States failed to sufficiently locate migrants and migrants’ rights at the centre of the migration agenda.
Time and again, in the name of national sovereignty, States placed restrictions on the rights they were prepared to extend to migrants. This is a movement away from previously agreed by consensus positions and a clear breach of international human rights standards.
We will, however, continue to engage in this process and forward our recommendations to the Informal interactive hearings for the High-level Dialogue on International Migration and Development United Nations, New York on 15 July 2013.
Please see the Civil Society Joint statement and the Outcome Document from the Asia-Pacific Regional Civil Society Consultation held in Bangkok from 29-31 May 2013 .
For comment, please contact:
Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development
[Pranom Somwong ,+668-31887600,+601-92371300 ]
Migrant Forum in Asia
[William Gois , (+63-2) 928-2740 / 433-3508]
The full title of the meeting was the “Asia-Pacific Regional Preparatory Meeting for the General Assembly High-level Dialogue on International Migration and Development 2013”. It was held in Bangkok from 29 to 31 May 2013.
This statement is issued jointly by Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD), Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants (APMM), Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW), Coalition of Asia-Pacific Regional Networks on HIV/AIDS (7 Sisters), Coordination of Action Research on AIDS and Mobility (CARAM Asia), Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (GAATW), Mekong Migration Network (MMN), and Migrant Forum in Asia (MFA).
Asia-Pacific Regional Preparatory Meeting for the General Assembly High-level Dialogue on International Migration and Development 2013
Bangkok, 29-31 May 2013
Agenda Item 4
We wish to thank the Member States and Secretariat of ESCAP, IOM, and members of the Asia-Pacific RCM Thematic Working Group on International Migration, including Human Trafficking, for giving civil society an opportunity to share our thoughts today. Thank you,Mr. Chair.
This statement is made on behalf of civil society organisations, trade unions and migrant workers, and its recommendations are reflective of the themes elaborated in the civil society 7-point, 5-year Agenda endorsed by the Civil Society Steering Committee for the UNHLD.
We welcome the opportunity to address this meeting, and hope to continue to be able to actively partner with you on critical issues of global migration governance and concrete action in the work towards and at the UN High Level Dialogue on International Migration & Development in New York in October. We appreciate the presence and willingness of the States that are here to engage in this process.
Considering that migrant workers support themselves, their families and communities; that countries of origin, transit and destination receive significant social and economic benefits from migrant workers; it is unacceptable that the international governance of migration rests outside the protection of the human rights framework.
Governments should actively prioritize ending all forms of discrimination against migrants, regardless of legal status or factors including nationality, gender, age, sexual orientation or gender identity, health and pregnancy status, or occupation.
The UN High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development and the post-2015 development agenda must focus on promoting decent work, including a living wage, for migrant and local workers alike. This is the only way to create shared prosperity, reduce inequalities, and dampen xenophobia. The decent work agenda must underpin all migration policies and programmes. Governments should respect the rights and the effective practice of freedom of association, which should also include worker organising and collective bargaining.
Governments must recognize that women are rights bearers and active agents in claiming their rights and contribute to just and fair development. It is imperative that an intersectional perspective on gender that establishes protections that recognize and take into account the numerous, specific risks that migrant women face and provide redress, including compensation be developed.
Governments of origin, transit and destination countries should recognize, respect and affirm migrants’ right to the highest attainable standards of physical and mental health, including sexual and reproductive health and rights, irrespective of migrant status. This should include health services for sexually transmitted infections, HIV, reproductive cancers, contraception, maternal health and safe abortion services. Governments must lift any discriminatory policies based on health status, including HIV status, pregnancy, and communicable diseases.
Governments should also prioritize occupational safety and health of migrants, and ensure safe working conditions and regular inspections of work places, including the elimination of industrial accidents and usage of hazardous or toxic materials.
We propose the establishment and strengthening of migrant-friendly, gender-sensitive and rights-based policies and mechanisms at origin, transit and destination countriesand in the international governance of migration, to ensure the following:
- Protection of migrant workers’labour rights, including the rights to equal pay and safe and healthy working conditions, to form and organise trade unions and migrant workers’ associations, to ensure portability of social protection, to guarantee access to health services and removal of policies that discriminate on the basis of health status, and to provide paths to citizenship for migrant workers and their families;
- Identification or creation, and implementation, of effective standards and mechanisms to regulate the migrant labour recruitment industry to prioritise the human rights of migrants;
- Migrants become stranded in many different ways—with emergency situations being one among many scenarios that can render migrants stranded. Governments must not see the label of stranded migrants as outside the existing human rights legal frameworks, but as complementary to the human rights framework including the Refugee Convention (1951), the International Convention on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (1990), and the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (1961)
- Governments should recognize the gender aspects of migration and address their impacts, and affirm women’s autonomy and protect and fulfill their rights throughout the migration process, ensuring independent migration status that provides the right to work and ensures access to redress. Governments must prevent and address sexual harassment, violence and sexual abuse in and outside of the workplace and to promote equitable access to sexual and reproductive health and rights.
- Governments should acknowledge children and youth as rights holders, and develop policies for them in the context of migration. This should involve investing in communities in sending areas, lowering the economic and social cost of migration, and ensuring that migrant children and youth, irrespective of their migration status, enjoy the legal protection and rights as per the Convention on the Rights of the Child and other international standards.
- Establish processes to facilitate the participation of migrants, people affected by migration, civil society and trade unions, in the development of laws, policies, programmes and initiatives on migration and migrants’ rights;
- Promote the exchange of good practice and enactment and implementation of national legislation to comply with the full range of provisions in international conventions that apply to migrants, migrant workers and their families, and refugees;
- Reaffirm that a human rights-based framework should be the primary framework for intergovernmental governance of migration and institutionalise the participation of civil society in these governance mechanisms;
- Integrate migration into the post-2015 development agenda in such a way as to address the financial and social contributions of migrants to development, and that protects and promotes migrants’ rights and ensures improved policy planning and coherence to make migration a genuine choice and not a necessity.
Thank you,Mr. Chair.
* This statement is endorsed by the following organisation
AMAL - Pakistan
Arunodhaya Migrant Initiative (India)
ASEAN Services Employees Trade Union Council (ASETUC)
Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD)
Asia Pacific Alliance for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (APA)
Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network (APRRN)
Asia-Pacific Mission for Migrants (APMM)
Asian Migrants Coordinating Body (AMCB)
Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW)
Building and Woodworkers’ International (BWI)
Coalition of Asia-Pacific Regional Networks on HIV/AIDS (7 Sisters)
Community Development Services (CDS), Sri Lanka
Coordination of Action Research on AIDS and Mobility (CARAM Asia)
Development Action for Women Network (DAWN), Philippines
Education International (EI)
Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (GAATW)
Global Migration Policy Associates (GMPA)
IMA Research Foundation, Bangladesh
Institute for Migration and Development, Philippines
International Trade Union Confederation – Asia Pacific
International Transport Federation (ITF)
Lawyers for Human Rights and Legal Aid (LHRLA), Pakistan
Mekong Migration Network (MMN)
Migrant Forum in Asia
Migrants Rights International
NIDS – Nepal
Peace Trust, India
Public Services International (PSI)
Raks Thai Foundation
St. John’s Cathedral HIV Education Centre, Hong Kong
Union Migrant Indonesia (UNIMIG)
Union Network International (UNI)
Workers Hub for Change
Issue 3, to be published 2014
Special Issue: ‘Following the Money: Spending on Anti-Trafficking’
Deadline for Submission: 15 December 2013
Anti-trafficking funding and work has mushroomed since the 1990s. Lacking is analysis of those anti-trafficking funds - where they come from, who they go to, what they are meant to do, what they actually achieve, and indeed whether they are needed.
Donors, organisations and trafficked persons’ priorities are not always aligned when it comes to how to spend money. In a first indication of a global mismatch between donors and organisations, AWID’s ‘Where’s the Money for Women’s Rights?’ survey of over 1000 women’s rights organisations shows that donors prioritise anti-trafficking (placing it in their top 10 list of priority issues to fund) more than women’s organisations (who do not see anti-trafficking among top 10 priority issues). Trafficked persons may or may not benefit from money flows aimed in their direction, or indeed may suffer as a result of anti-trafficking spending. Many organisations specifically dedicated to anti-trafficking think donors do not prioritise this issue enough. Others feel anti-trafficking funds, especially for more surface-level awareness campaigns, divert attention and money away from substantial human rights work on issues concerning workers, migrants, woman and children.
Of course, politics behind anti-trafficking money abound, and recipient organisations wonder whether they should take ‘tied’ funds, funds with restrictions or ‘dirty’ money that, for instance, may have originated from the profits of a company that employs workers in exploitative conditions. HIV/AIDS organisations struggle to decide whether to take up funds from a donor that mandates they stop handing out condoms. In recent years governments have rushed to spend money on a range of poorly designed initiatives in the hope of moving out of a low ranking in the US government's yearly Trafficking in Persons Report.
The Anti-Trafficking Review calls for papers for a Special Issue ‘Following the Money: Spending on Anti-Trafficking’. This issue will present well-researched articles that analyze the funding landscape. The journal is interested in what kinds of organisations and work have been raised up by anti-trafficking funding and what work has been sidelined or excluded as a result. The journal is interested in studies of money trails that reveal how anti-trafficking money has changed the world for the better or for worse. Papers may address:
Total amounts allocated by government and private donors since the beginning of 2001, including any identifiable shifts in the geographical areas to which money has been allocated or the purpose of funding;
Investments made by donors during the first decade since the Trafficking Protocol which have (or have not) had a noticeable impact—and lessons that donors may have learnt about what sort of spending actually prevents human trafficking;
Motives behind anti-trafficking funding, such as, for instance, self-promotion in awareness raising campaigns, versus ‘genuine’ anti-trafficking goals;
Tied aid, restrictions on spending, and foreign policy agendas such as democratisation behind aid;
How spending on anti-trafficking compares to related sectors, now or historically, and whether increases in allocations to anti-trafficking can be seen to have reduced allocations to specific other sectors (and with what results);
How funding for anti-trafficking is divided between prevention, protection and prosecution or other core anti-trafficking activities and whether this split is justified;
How money is accounted for, and what return donors seek for their funding;
How organisations have benefited in particular from the inflow of money for anti-trafficking initiatives, and with what wider ramifications;
How independent funding sources are, and impacts on programming when a proportion of funds is linked to State funding mechanisms.
This issue features a ‘Debate Section’. We welcome articles addressing the question: Is there too much or too little money for anti-trafficking?
The Review promotes a human rights based approach to anti-trafficking, and it aims to explore the issue in its broader context including gender analyses and intersections with labour and migrant rights. The journal offers a space for dialogue for those seeking to communicate new ideas and findings. Academics, practitioners and advocates, working for, with and including trafficked persons and migrants are invited to submit articles. The Review presents rigorously considered, peer reviewed material in clear English. The journal is an open source, annual publication with a readership in 78 countries.
Deadline for submission: 15 December 2013.
Word limit: 6,000, including footnotes and abstract
If possible, let us know in advance (at
) what particular aspect/s of this topic you propose to write about by telling us the title and scope of your proposed article. Before submission, please take note of our Contributor Guidelines and Style Guide at www.antitraffickingreview.org. Contact the editorial team at
Special Issue Guest Editor: Mike Dottridge
Editor: Rebecca Napier-Moore